11 - Existence proofs and counterexamples

Focusing on proving there exists statements.

Constructive existence proofs

Find an element in the set. When working with existence qualifiers, use "fix", "put", or "set" instead of "let" - which is used for an arbitrary value.

!Screenshot 2023-10-01 at 7.25.06 PM.png

Intermediate value theorem

If f:[a,b]→R is continuous, then for any y satisfying f(a)<y<f(b) or f(b)<y<f(a), there exists c∈(a,b) such that f(c)=y.

Nonconstructive existence proofs

Uniqueness

It's common to write ∃!x∈S,R(x).

In class practice

Proposition. Every odd integer is the sum of two consecutive integers.

Proof. Let a∈ODD. Thus a=2k+1 for some k∈Z. That is a=k+(k+1), and so a is the sum of two consecutive integers k and k+1. ◻

Proposition. The equation 2x3+2x−3=0 has a solution in the interval (0, 1).

Proof. The function f(x)=2x3+2x−3 is a polynomial, and thus continuous everywhere. We find that f(0)=−3 and f(1)=1. By the intermediate value theorem, we know that f must take the intermediate value 0 for some x∈(0,1). ◻



HW 11

Ben Finch

E 11.1
a) Fix a=1,b=2. Then a,b∈Q. We have 12=1∈Q. ◻

b) Fix a=2, b=12. Then a,b∈Q. We have 2(12)=2∈R−Q. ◻

c) HW_11_1c 1.jpg

d) Fix a=0,b=2. Then a∈Q and b∈R−Q. We have 02=0∈Q. ◻

e) Fix a=2,b=2. Then a∈Q and b∈R−Q. We have ab=22.

f) Fix a=2,b=2. Then a∈R−Q and b∈Q. We have 22=2∈Q. ◻

g) Fix a=2,b=1. Then a∈R−Q and b∈Q. We have 21=2∈R−Q. ◻

E 11.2
Disproof. Fix x=0 and y=2. We have xy=0∉R−Q. ◻

E 11.3
Disproof. Fix 6s−3=−3. Thus s=0∉ODD. ◻

E 11.4
Disproof. Let x∈Z. We work directly. There are two cases:

Case 1: Suppose x is odd. Thus x=2k+1 for some k∈Z. We find

x2+x=(2k+1)1+2k+1=4k2+4k+1+2k+1=2(2k2+3k+1)

is even.

Case 2: Suppose x is even. Thus x=2k for some k∈Z. We find

x2+x=(2k)2+2k=4k2+2k=2(2k2+k)

is even.

Hence we have for all cases that ∀x∈Z, if x is odd, then x2+x is even. ◻

E 11.5

Lemma. We are trying to prove that a non-zero rational number times an irrational number is irrational. Let x∈Q and y∈R−Q where x≠0. Thus x=mn for some nonzero m,n∈Z. Assume by way of contradiction that xy∈Q. Thus xy=jk for some j,k∈Z. We find

xy=jkmn(y)=jky=jnmk

Since m,n,j,k∈Z, jnmk∈Q which contradicts our original assumption that y∈Q. Thus a nonzero rational number times and irrational number is irrational. ◻

Proof. We work directly. Assume a is a positive rational number. We can break this into two cases:

Case 1: a>2. Thus a possible x=2 which is irrational.

Case 2: a<2. Let x=a2=a(12). Per the lemma, a(12) is irrational. Also, a2 is less than 2.

Thus in all cases, we have x∈R−Q. ◻

E 11.6

Proposition. Given any two real numbers x and y such that x<y, we want to show that there exists a rational number in the interval (x,y).

Proof.

Let x,y∈R. Let y−x>0. We can express y−x in decimal form as dkdk−1...d1d0.d−1d−2d−3.... Since y−x>0, there exists at least one decimal digit that is non-zero; let the first one be dl. Thus the value contributed by dl to y−x is at least dl⋅10l−1. Since dl is non-zero, we have dl≥1.

So y−x>10l−1.

Multiplying the inequality by 10−(l−1) gives us 10−(l−1)(y−x)>1.

Denoting 10−(l−1)y as Y and 10−(l−1)x as X, we obtain Y−X>1.

Since X and Y are more than 1 apart, there exists an integer n such that X<n<Y.

Given that X=10−(l−1)x and Y=10−(l−1)y, we have 10−(l−1)x<n<10−(l−1)y.

Rewriting this as x<10l−1n<y and denoting 10l−1n as q, we find that x<q<y, where q is rational since 10l−1n is a product of an integer and a rational number.

Hence, for all real numbers x and y such that x<y, there exists a rational number q in the interval (x,y). ◻